
Art sabotage strives to be
perfectly exemplary but at the same
time
retain an element of opacity - not propaganda but æsthetic shock
- apallingly direct yet also subtly angled - action-as-metaphor.
Art Sabotage is the dark
side of Poetic Terrorism - creation through destruction - but it cannot
serve any Party, nor any nihilism, nor even art itself. Just as the
banishment of illusion enhances awareness, so the demolition of æsthetic
blight sweetens the air of the world of discourse, of the Other. Art Sabotage
serves only consciousness,
attentiveness,
awakeness.
A-S goes beyond paranoia,
beyond deconstruction - the ultimate criticism - physical attack on offensive
art - æsthetic jihad. The slightest taint of petty ego-icity or even
of personal taste spoils its purity & vitiates its
force.
A-S can never seek power - only release it.
Individual artworks (even the worst) are largely irrelevant - A-S seeks to damage institutions which use art to diminish consciousness & profit by delusion. This or that poet or painter cannot be condemned for lack of vision - but malign Ideas can be assaulted through the artifacts they generate. MUZAK is designed to hypnotize & control - its machinery can be smashed.
Public book burnings - why
should rednecks & Customs officials monopolize this weapon? Novels
about children possessed by demons; the New York Times bestseller list;
feminist
tracts against pornography; schoolbooks (especially Social Studies, Civics,
Health); piles of New York Post, Village Voice & other supermarket
papers; choice gleanings of Xtian publishers; a few Harlequin Romances
- a festive atmosphere, wine-bottles & joints passed around on a clear
autumn afternoon.
To throw money away at the
Stock Exchange was pretty decent Poetic Terrorism - but to destroy the
money would have been good Art Sabotage. To seize TV transmission &
broadcast a few pirated minutes of incendiary
Chaote
art would constitute a feat of PT - but simply to blow up the
transmission
tower would be perfectly adequate Art Sabotage. If certain galleries
& museums deserve an occasional brick through their windows -
not destruction, but a jolt to complacency - then what about BANKS? Galleries
turn beauty into a commodity but banks transmute
Imagination
into feces and debt. Wouldn't the world gain a degree of beauty with each
bank that could be made to tremble... or fall? But how? Art Sabotage should
probably stay away from politics (it's so boring) - but not from banks.
Don't picket - vandalize.
Don't protest - deface.