![]() |
The Physics Of
Immortality
This nOde
last updated September 18th, 2002 and is permanently morphing...
(1 Ben (Reed) / 6 Ch'en (Black) - 53/260 -
12.19.9.10.13)

Paperback (September 1995)
Anchor Books/Doubleday;
ISBN: 0385467990 ;
Dimensions
(in inches): 1.23 x 7.97 x 5.10
![]() |
Reviews
From Booklist , September
15, 1994
What to make of a book that
postulates mathematical proof of the existence of god, guarantees the resurrection
of the dead, and promises that, for those who so desire, there will be
sex in heaven? Tipler certainly has all the credentials of a bona fide
physicist. He's a professor of mathematical physics at Tulane University
and specializes in global general relativity, the branch of physics pioneered
by Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking, but his study of the cosmos has led
him to some rather extreme and disconcerting ideas based on an uneasy mix
of science, theology, and fantasy. While some of his discussions about
time,
space, and life, which he defines as "
information
preserved
by natural selection," are challenging and alluring, his conclusions are
simply wild. For instance, Tipler rather blithely tells us that after leaving
the doomed earth to colonize other planets, our species will eventually
become extinct, but life itself will survive in our "machine descendants,"
who will, in turn, ensure the resurrection of each and every person who
ever lived. When will this occur? "The dead will be resurrected when the
computer capacity of the universe is so large that the amount of capacity
required to store all possible human simulations is an insignificant fraction
of the entire capacity." Apparently, Tipler takes great comfort in this
thought, as will, perhaps, some of his readers. The rest may just experience
an overwhelming sense of dismay. Donna Seaman
From Kirkus Reviews , July
15, 1994
A scientific argument that
foresees the
evolution
of
computer intelligence into an equivalent of god is likely to be greeted
with skepticism by the majority of readers, and those who wade through
this densely argued text are likely to emerge more
puzzled
than enlightened. Tipler (Mathematical Physics/Tulane) offers a cosmological
theory he calls the
Omega
Point, based on the expansion of intelligent life to fill the known
universe. Since the distances between habitable planets are so great, only
spacegoing computers can ever hope to colonize the universe, he argues.
The constant increase of computer intelligence will allow future computers
not only to equal human accomplishments, but to recreate in exact detail
all human beings who have ever lived. Tipler's insistence on calling this
recreation a "resurrection" seems to be overstating his case. Similarly,
a universal computer intelligence may be the sort of deity suitable to
science
fiction, but not one that many church-goers would find satisfactory.
As tests of his theory, Tipler makes several predictions, one of which,
involving the mass of the top
quark,
is in agreement with recently obtained experimental data, but most of which
the average reader has no way to evaluate. He devotes the concluding chapters
to consideration of such traditional theological questions as the problem
of evil, the nature of heaven and hell, and a comparison of the Omega Point
theory to the views of the world's great religions. An ``Appendix for Scientists''
provides more rigorous presentation of his arguments for those capable
of following advanced mathematics. Tipler is wrestling with issues of enormous
importance, but in the end his answers seem highly idiosyncratic and unlikely
either to convert the skeptics or to satisfy the religious. (20 line drawings)
Synopsis
A professor of physics explains how he used a
mathematical model of the universe to confirm the existence of god and
the likelihood that every human who ever lived will be resurrected from
the dead.
|
||
|
Tipler and John Barrow's
earlier book _The Anthropic Cosmological Principle_ (1986) dared to explore
a future where intelligent life colonised the universe using
von
Neumann probes and
evolved
to Become the ultimate arbiters of the space-time continuum. _The Physics
of Immortality_ explored even further realms of possibility. If our universe
is closed, Tipler had earlier suggested, it will collapse into a final
Omega
Point or
Singularity
(not to be confused with
Terence
McKenna's
2012
Singularity, based upon
Mayan
calendrics). Intelligent life might be able to 'engineer' this collapse
at a specific rate in order to survive (a 'Taub'-like collapse).
'The Physics of God' contains
several theoretical variations. As evolving intelligence reaches greater
complexity, the Omega Point approaches the Judeo-Christian concept of an
omniscient God. Drawing upon games theory and 'The
Prisoner's
Dilemma', Tipler claims that this God would be altruistic, as this is a
superior evolutionary longterm strategy.
Tipler's book and Omega-Point Theory generated
much controversy and ridicule. Some critics interpreted it as the arrival
of Postmodernism within the citadels of Science, cloaking questionable
theoretical assumptions extended far beyond their limits and theology with
the
impression
of serious scientific scholarship. Others pointed to the difference between
postulating a theory and believing in it. Some theologians found Tipler's
conceptualisation of God to be distant and unacceptable. The existence
of
black
holes; the nature of future intelligent life; the harsh conditions
required for life to survive during a collapsing universe; and the inability
to test the hypothetical
process
of ressurection have all been points for heated debate.
![]() |
_The Physics Of Immortality_
is an early sign of an emerging post-millennial Renaissance (
dubbed
'The Third Culture' by author John Brockman) in which the findings of
Quantum
Physics,
Artificial
Intelligence and Genetic Engineering are generating new cosmologies,
philosophies (
Extropian
and
Trans-humanism)
and designer religions. Tipler has attracted much flak for boldly breaking
the Science/Theology taboo, and for his use of scientific
language.
His audacious ideas are in danger of being simplified for the general public
- like those of
Hans
Moravec and Stephen Hawking - without the detail for supporting arguments.
Although its Omega-Point
hypothesis is ultimately unproveable, _The Physics of Immortality_ is a
mind-bending and important book. Its cosmology is timely for a science
fiction age. It conveys how deeply entrenched Judeo-Christian perspectives
on 'Life in the Cosmos' and God are. Lastly, when too few scientists offer
eschatalogical
speculations of possible futures to be dynamically generated by our species
into
reality,
Tipler offers us a compelling Vision of possible survival. But who will
have the defiant Voice to bring such a Vision into being?
by Alex Burns
alex.burns@disinfo.net